copyright 2009, Jump Cut: A Review of Contemporary Media
Jump Cut
, No. 51, spring 2009

"Juking the stats"

The political structure, as portrayed in The Wire, has adopted the priorities of finance capitalism. Commodity value is consistently prioritized over use value. The public sector has become increasingly impoverished — to the point where it cannot meet basic needs — while money accumulates in other sectors, particularly in the drug trade, beyond any possible need or use. For example, drug lord Marlo has no idea what to do with all the wealth he has amassed, although he does invest in the future loyalty of his prospective workers by handing out money for new school clothes in the manner of a feudal lord dispensing favors. Meanwhile the public sphere remains stripped of resources. Politicians cut budgets, and police and teachers cut corners on the job and go into debt at home.

To defend their declining position, educational and legal institutions adopt prevailing modes of justification so that public services appear to produce little in the way of real results. The school system struggles but fails to educate, and the police force strives but fails to reduce crime. This environment seems to produce nothing of market value, so how is performance in the social sector to be measured? Paradoxically, the measurement that exists cloaks the lack of meaningful performance. Even further, producing the metrics disincentivises meaningful performance. The street rips drain time and energy from policing, which should be targeting the powerful players and the causes of crime. Teaching to the test does the same with respect to education, which should be opening the mind to the world.

From the first episode, this kind of dilemma is made starkly clear. McNulty, after talking to a judge, unwittingly brings to the bosses’ attention a series of related murders linked to the Barksdales. The detective is reprimanded in the harshest terms for violating the chain of command. However, what most disturbs the head of the homicide division, Major Rawls, is the fact that McNulty uses as evidence one of the murders from the previous year, which would therefore have no bearing on the current year’s case-solved statistics.

The massaging of crime figures is clearly illustrated in The Wire, where it is regularly described as "juking the stats." In season three we are introduced to COMSTAT meetings. Via Powerpoint slides, police give figures to suggest there are now decreases in crime. Since police at all levels, from the commissioner down, are often berated and even demoted for their failures, they defend themselves by finding ways to reclassify crimes, making aggravated assaults into common assaults, and effectively doing everything but make bodies disappear. Sometimes policemen even try that. When the bodies concealed by the Stanfield gang are discovered, the homicide sergeant suggests to the detective that he might want to leave them where they are, as there are only three weeks left in the year and the unit clearance rate is already under 50%.

Other relevant metrics play a role, as well as the year and body count. For example, some dead bodies are discovered in a location with a zip code that doesn’t matter — a statistic with strong undercurrents of race and class. As the cops put it, dozens of black, poor bodies in Baltimore count for less than one white suburban ex-cheerleader in Aruba. Such a conversation takes place in the local newsroom as well. In other instances, overtime pay can become a metric, as one lazy detective insists that "cases go from red to black via green."[34][open endnotes in new window]

The tyranny of numbers extends beyond the police department. When Roland Pryzbylewski is dismissed from the police force for accidentally shooting a black officer, he becomes a public school teacher. Sitting in a meeting to discuss how to "teach the test" for the forthcoming "no child left behind" standardized tests, he experiences a flash of recognition. "Juking the stats,’ he comments to a colleague, explaining:

"You juke the stats and majors become colonels. I’ve been here before."

Manipulating teaching procedures just to achieve adequate test scores parallels manipulating crime statistics at COMSTAT. The progress made by Pryzbylewski's own unconventional teaching methods, and by an experimental programme designed to resocialize troubled children, is eviscerated. In a succession of scenes ironically juxtaposed against each other, the high school's seminar on a teaching strategy for the test is edited against a police meeting on anti-terrorism.

There is a constant tension in the series between those who want to do the job well and those who want to climb the career ladder, even though this usually means doing the job badly. We see it play out over and over, whether between cops, politicians, lawyers, teachers or journalists. Conversely, there is no career ladder for the dockers of season two.

The police are the most sustained presence in the series. Characters such as Freamon, McNulty, Daniels, and Greggs have a commitment to building strong but difficult cases, tracing how the money and power are routed. However, these officers are constantly under pressure from those higher up the chain of command, who are in turn under pressure from city hall, to produce easy street rips that will produce arrests and drug seizures. That's the kind of police action known to generate enthusiatic press conferences and impressive crime stats. Under such pressure, Daniels worries that one generation is training the next how not to do the job.

The good guys do not win. By the end of the series some of the best police must go — Daniels, McNulty, Freamon, Colvin — while the worst thrive — Valchek, Rawls, Burrell. Yet some — Greggs, Moreland, Carver — also survive and try to do another decent day’s work. The police exhibit the same moral ambiguity as does society as a whole. The venal but eloquent Sergeant Landsman reflects:

"We are policing a culture of moral decline."

"We had us a community."

Not that any character believes in a past golden age, but citizens at neighborhood meetings do articulate fond memories of chatting with the cop on the beat when both knew each others’ names and stories. Various characters contrast the present with a past time of productivity and community. For example, a striking confrontation between past and present comes in an exchange between outlaw Omar Little and Detective Bunk Moreland. Bunk calls Omar to account for the decline of the neighborhood where they both grew up:

"As rough as that neighbourhood could be, we had us a community... And now all we got is bodies. And predatory motherfuckers like you. And out where that girl fell, I saw kids acting like Omar, calling you by name, glorifying your ass. Makes me sick, motherfucker, how far we done fell."

This is paralleled by another scene between cop and criminal. Ex-major Colvin, when visiting Wee-Bay Brice in prison to ask for custody of the prisoner's son, gets into a conversation where they both recall the west side they once knew and contrast it to what they see now: a place without family, code, respect. The difference between what places were and are and how different characters have experienced this change is marked in a myriad of ways. Thus, Deputy Commissioner Daniels visits a hall where dead bodies from vacant houses have been brought to be processed, and he remembers that he went to school there.

Unemployment, underemployment, the priorities of the stats game, and the victory of rampant capitalism have destroyed not only this older world that made sense, but the prescriptive narratives and solidarities that grew from it. The labor movement, the black power movement and the ideals of empowerment through education have all been debased and eviscerated. Economist Marcellus Andrews has suggested:

"The end of the American segregation system a half century ago put black people onto the blue-collar road to the middle class just when the on-ramp shut down."[35]

47% of black males in Baltimore are unemployed. The police in this scenario are caught between enforcing a war on drugs that has become a war on the underclass and containing the chaos unleashed by it.[36]

"Sharing a dark corner of the American experiment"

Some of the scenes where we see most clearly the identity, contradictions and solidarity of the police subculture and its relation to the wider culture are at the wakes for dead policemen. The ritual usually involves going to an Irish bar, laying out the corpse on a pool table, drinking whiskey, singing The Body of an American (The Pogues) and eulogizing the dead cop.

Discussing the dead policeman at Cole’s wake, one of the most memorable scenes in the series, Homicide Sergeant Landsman characterizes the characters' lives as "sharing a dark corner of the American experiment." In a montage of brief shots, the character of Cole, the Irish cop, is visually reconstructed. Some of the elements in the mise-en-scene are contradictory, even outlandish. On a pool table draped with a police flag are arranged a photo of the dead officer in dress uniform, rosary beads hanging over one corner and a St. Bridget’s cross lying in front of it. A shot of a bottle of Jameson Irish whiskey held in the corpse's left hand cuts quickly to a close-up of the wedding ring on his third finger. Shots of cuff links, cigars and tie follow in quick succession before settling briefly on his police shield. The figure of Cole as a symbol of policing, albeit a chaotic and contradictory one, is thus established, a perception heightened by Landsman's observation that he was neither the world's greatest cop nor its worst. Neither was he the world's greatest husband nor the worst. A wider angled shot during the eulogy completes the picture: a candle, a celtic cross and a statue of the Virgin Mary.

The incongruity of these elements is replicated even more forcefully at the seeming wake held for McNulty when he leaves the police force. He is symbolically dead, having left the brotherhood. Ironically for this uniquely promiscuous and self-destructive detective, the table is positively cluttered with religious kitsch, including votive candles and plaster hands draped with a rosary, alongside the obligatory bottle of Jameson and statue of the Virgin Mary. The verbose and articulate Landsman is momentarily lost for words, but he must ultimately admit to a grudging respect for the "dead" detective, the black sheep. In the only positive words he ever spoke to or about McNulty, Landsman declares that if his own body were found lying dead on the street, there is no one he would rather have standing over him investigating the case than McNulty.

Season five takes as its theme the mass media. Journalists too find themselves inhabiting a dark corner of the American experiment. They too find themselves in a different relation to the city from what they once had. Beset by pressures of bylines, deadlines and prizes alongside problems created by cutbacks, out-of-town ownership, buyouts of the most experienced staff and declining circulation, reporters find themselves disconnected from the city they are charged to report. Some go for the fast track to promotion and prizes, undercutting the process of building long-term knowledge of long-term situations, establishing contacts, creating trust, and understanding more of the context in which they operate.

Simon believes that the indifferent logic of Wall Street has poisoned relations between newspapers and their cities. The management of the Baltimore Sun, as represented in the series, is preoccupied with gaining Pulitzer prizes. The newspaper's formula, according to Simon, is this:

"Surround a simple outrage, overreport it, claim credit for breaking it, make sure you find a villain, then claim you effected change as a result of your coverage."[37]

Much journalism focuses on the symptoms rather than the disease, which Simon compares to coming to a house hit by a hurricane and making voluminous notes on the displaced roof tiles. One type of story is "small, self-contained and has good guys and bad guys," whereas the other is informed by a bigger picture and a longer history and reveals what is happening in society.[38]

In The Wire we see the marginalization of journalists who know the city and write about it with high standards for accuracy and context. They face the work of other journalists who are cutting corners and going for the glittering prizes, sometimes even at the expense of the true story. Thus the character Scott Templeton, who gets into the habit of making up what he can’t find, is lionized by his managing editors and wins a Pulitzer Prize. Those who start to wonder and check the facts, particularly the honourable and meticulous city editor, Gus Haynes, are undermined. Thus, this plotline mirrors what happens in the police force, school system and city hall.

The Wire has a thoughtful scene structure that plays out across its various seasons. Throughout the series, some scenes parallel each other almost exactly. For example, in one episode a cop vents his frustration and remarks that he would like to experience what it would be like to work in "a real police department." Later in the same episode we hear a journalist lament that he would like someday to find out what it would be like to work in a "a real newspaper." In city hall and in the school system, we hear echoes of the same regret and aspiration. While cops and journalists both speak from within the restricted viewpoints of their respective jobs, the viewer is aware of the grander narrative sweep. The problems these workers identify are not isolated and unconnected but part of a deeper systemic logic that pervades all such institutions and encumbers all of their efforts. Each season ends with a stylish and stirring montage that pulls together the various storylines and projects them into the immediate future, leaving the viewer pondering the storylines' outcomes and reflecting on their causes and consequences.

In the newspaper plotline, the conflict is not just about the stories that the reporters get wrong for one reason or another, but about the fact that they fail to get at all the major stories that dominate the drama, things which the viewers but not the reporters understand. That, according to Simon, is the "big ass elephant in our mythical newsroom."[39] The reporters do not uncover the stories about juking the stats on crime or education. They do not reveal that this is being driven by city hall or that the mayor is reverting to the practices he pledged to reform. They do not probe the connections between property transactions and political corruption. They have no idea of how the drugs trade works. The death of Proposition Joe, a major player in East Baltimore drugs, is relegated to the inside pages and the death of Omar, a semi-mythic figure in West Baltimore, is bumped from the paper altogether.

We do see the underworld of drug addiction and homelessness as pursued by two different journalists in diametrically opposed ways. One inflates his investigation and pitches it for career advancement. The other looks and listens carefully and opens that world through a life story sensitively told.

In depicting the world of print journalism, the script provides a strong sense of social decline, driven by the Simon’s own experience of reporting for the Baltimore Sun and then following its transformation over the past few decades. In one scene, two journalists remember why they wanted to be newspapermen. One recalls seeing his father read the paper every morning at breakfast so thoroughly and intently that the child wanted to be part of something so important as to require that sort of concentrated attention. Another told of a man whom he saw on the bus every day and how that man folded his paper in sections and read it with such great care. There is a sense of a loss of coherence in a society where the daily newspaper was once part of a wider workaday ritual.

"That black pride bullshit"

Another absence, also evoking a sense of social decline, is political protest. We see little organized opposition to the deindustrialisation and demoralization of the city and to the macroeconomic forces driving the city's decline. The protests we do see are effectively stunts, stage-managed from the top. On one occasion new mayor Tommy Carcetti is seeking to divert attention from the failings of the law enforcement and education systems. He exploits a growing sense of outrage surrounding an apparent spate of homeless murders by organizing a candlelight vigil outside city hall. By this masterful piece of politicking, he can place the blame for homelessness on federal and state administrations, both Republican, as opposed to the Democratic city administration. Carcetti knows better than what he does. On one occasion, he anticipates what his advisor is thinking by invoking the injunction about speaking truth to power. [40]

On another occasion, when Clay Davis, corrupt state senator, goes on trial, he manages to transform the accusation of gross corruption to self-defense against a racist witch-hunt. He presents himself as a beneficent patron of the city’s black poor, his pockets never full for long, as he hears his constituents' troubles and pays their bills. He arrives at the courthouse carrying a copy of Aeschylus' Prometheus Bound, the tale of

"a simple man, who was horrifically punished by the powers that be for the terrible crime of trying to bring light to the common people."

In the courtroom, drawing on the rhetoric of the civil rights movement, Davis skillfully manipulates the discourses of race and class against his opponents, who, he claims, have no idea how things are for the black poor. He refers to those pulling the strings above the black state attorney. He enlists a corrupt former mayor to his cause, who makes reference to those "persecuting ... our leaders." This courthouse rally culminates in a chorus of We shall not be moved. While it is apparent that significant sections of the black political establishment are engaged in graft, the enduring and systemic character of inequality enables them to draw on a radical tradition and to distort it to nefarious ends.

The spirit of the 60s finds such echoes elsewhere in The Wire. Avon Barksdale and Stringer Bell regularly use the black power handshake. In one conversation Avon refers teasingly to their youthful enthusiasm for "that black pride bullshit." Brother Mouzone, an enforcer brought from New York to Baltimore by the Barksdales, is a ruthless gun for hire, whose appearance evokes Malcolm X, but he is without substance. He prides himself on reading The Nation, New Republic, Atlantic Monthly and Harpers, but how he relates the political debates in them to his role as enforcer in the drugs trade is unclear. A philosophy of collective liberation has morphed into a Hobbesian war of all against all. For all their talk of being brothers, Avon and Stringer have already betrayed each other and Avon has set in motion the murder of Stringer.

This tradition of black radicalism is sometimes evoked in a more positive way. When Cutty Wise is released from prison and finally escapes the drug trade to open a community boxing club, his new optimism is underlined during an election day jog, accompanied on his walkman by Curtis Mayfield’s Move on up, a significant moment of scoring in a series that largely eschews the use of a musical soundtrack. Such optimism is undercut, however, when Cutty is canvassed and admits that as a former felon he is barred from voting, a mechanism that further disempowers the underclass.

In this depiction of black Baltimore, echoes of the sixties are weak — considering the scale and dynamism of the upheavals that shook the U.S. and the world in the 1960s and 1970s, when masses marched against war, racism, sexism, imperialism, when there was a longing for liberation, when there was such striving to live in a new way. The Wire cannot make present, however, what is absent or attenuated in the wider culture that it represents. The script gives a strong sense that this movement has been both co-opted and defeated. The residue of the civil rights movement seems to have left in Baltimore a lack of confidence in collective action, a lack of faith in alternative possibilities.[41]

"All the pieces matter."

Contemporary political references abound in the series. The aftermath of 9/11 surfaces in showing how the FBI reordered its priorities from drug investigations to the war on terror. In one instance, an INS agent points out a sign for the Department of Homeland Security and asks McNulty if he feels any different. McNulty admits that he didn’t vote in the 2004 election, because neither Bush nor Kerry had any idea of what was going on where he works.

Other plotlines bring in contemporary events. One journalist refers to a call that a colleague supposedly received from a serial killer and remarks that it must be strange to talk to a psychopath. In response, another reminds them that he interviewed Dick Cheney once. Another time, a woman in the city informs an old friend that her sister is working at a school in the county "teaching every nigger to speak like Condoleeza." And as a police seminar on anti-terrorism descends into farce, one officer calls out, "Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job," a reference to George Bush's infamous post-Katrina comment to the head of FEMA.[42]

Iraq is a recurring point of reference, not only directly, but analogically. The story of a homeless Iraqi war veteran features in the final season. Police patrolling the streets of Baltimore compare the city to Fallujah, with one recommending the use of air strikes and white phosphorous. Furthermore, the whole war on drugs is meant to mirror the war on terror. One sequence, for example, alludes to the twin towers of 9/11. After the demolition of two housing project towers indirectly triggers a protracted and pointless power struggle, one gangster says, "If it’s a lie, then we fight on that lie."[43]

As the series moves to its conclusion, various scenes evoke the beginning. In the final episode, Detective Sydnor meets with Judge Phelan just as McNulty did in the first episode. Detectives go to a crime scene in the low-rises where they find a body in the shadow of the same statue where the body of a witness murdered in season one was found. We see Michael become the new Omar and Dukie become the new Bubbles. The concluding scenes, particularly the final montage, are marshalled to show that the police department, drug trade, school system, newspaper, and city hall all carry on in the same way. No matter what characters have risen or fallen or died, the cycle continues and the system survives.

The series is more diagnostic than prescriptive. Nevertheless, Simon has said that he intends the show to be a political provocation. As interviewers ask what sort of political response he means to provoke, he has replied that he is a not social crusader, claiming to be a storyteller coming to the campfire with truest possible story he can tell. What people do with that story, he says, is up to them.[44] Simon admits he's pessimistic about the possibility of political change since he finds the political infrastructure bought, journalism eviscerated, the working class decimated, and the underclass narcotized. The Wire exhibits the "audacity of despair."[45]

While occasionally Simon indicates politicians lack courage to take on real problems, ultimately he sees the problems as rooted in systemic failure. Underlying The Wire’s story-arc is the conviction that social exclusion and corruption do not exist in spite of the system but because of it. Its scepticism about reform comes from recognizing that substantive social change is not possible "within the current political structure."[46] Simon has declared the series to be about "the decline of the American empire."[47]

No such critique of the U.S. empire is detectable in the most recent production of Simon and Burns on HBO, the Iraq war drama Generation Kill. Based on the writings of an embedded journalist, Evan Wright, it stands in strong contrast to The Wire. The new miniseries abandons a multi-perspectival structure and systemic critique. It does have some features in common with The Wire: the sense of institutional imperatives, a perception-driven bureaucracy, and the conflicting aims of the troops and their commanding officers. The recon marines just want to do their job, while the officers want headline-busting tactical and strategic coups. Yet the script does not question what that job is. The drama is myopic. Despite the fact that Simon and Burns oppose the war, any critique of the war is absent and the system driving the war remains unquestioned in the drama. Furthermore, the voices of Iraqis are all but silent.

While The Wire offers a critique of the war on drugs, Generation Kill does not offer a critique of the war on Iraq. While it does demonstrate that the war is badly organized and executed, the miniseries gives no sense that the war itself is illegitimate or immoral. It identifies all too fully with the point of view of the soldiers on the ground and indicates that if they were not frustrated by their commanders, they could do a worthwhile job of soldiering well. Hopefully, Simon and Burns' new project Treme, set in post-Karina New Orleans, will be a return to their best work.

"A Marxist’s dream of a series"

The Wire's narrative and metanarrative have prompted some commentators to see it as "a Marxist’s dream of a series."[48] In a session at the Museum of Television and Radio, Ken Tucker introduced Simon as "the most brilliant Marxist to run a TV show."[49] While Simon did not contradict Tucker, he has elsewhere asserted that he is not a Marxist. When asked if he is a socialist, he has declared that he is a social democrat. He believes that capitalism is the only game in town, that it is not only inevitable but unrivalled in its power to produce wealth.

However he opposes

"raw, unencumbered capitalism, absent any social framework, absent any sense of community, without regard to the weakest and most vulnerable classes in society — it’s a recipe for needless pain, needless human waste, needless tragedy."[50]

Simon is for radical redistribution — "no trickle down bullshit"[51] — but not "to each according to his needs" either.[52] Nevertheless, everything in The Wire calls for a system requiring from each according to their abilities and giving to each according to their needs.

As to class struggle, characters struggle individually, but there is no sign of concerted class struggle likely to emerge as a counter-force of significant consequence. Simon identifies with the social existentialism of Camus: To commit to a just cause against overwhelming odds is absurd, but not to commit is equally absurd. Only one choice, however, offers the slightest chance for dignity.[53] Simon also refers on a number of occasions to Sisyphus rolling a large rock up a hill. The Wire has told a

"darker, more honest story on American television ... indifferent to the calculations of real estate speculators, civic boosters and politicians looking toward higher office."[54]

Simon is "proud of making something that wasn’t supposed to exist."[55]

What Simon thinks of Marxism is one thing (and it is not always clear), but what Marxists think of him is another. The Wire is a Marxist’s idea of what TV drama should be. Its specific plots open into an analysis of the social-political-economic system shaping the whole. The series has demonstrated the potential of television narrative to dramatize the nature of the social order, a potential that TV drama has long neglected or inadequately pursued.

In probing the parameters of the intricate interactions between multiple individuals and institutions, the complex script, seen over all the seasons, excavates the underlying structures of power and stimulates engagement with overarching ideas. It bristles, even boils over, with systemic critique. While it offers no expectation of an alternative, it provokes reflection on the need for one and an aspiration towards one. It may not have been written by Marxists to dramatize a Marxist worldview, but it is hard to see how a series written on this terrain by Marxists would be much different from The Wire.


[1] The Wire was a Home Box Office production.
See http://www.hbo.com/thewire/.
The title is meant to refer literally to the wire tap, used in surveillance through the whole series, but also symbolically to the boundary running between different strata of society.[return to essay]

[2] The Wire "was shot entirely in Baltimore by Baltimore craft and labour unions." David Simon, audio commentary onepisode 1.1 (The Target) on The Wire: The Complete First Season (HBO Video/Warner Home Video, 2005)

[3] See http://video.google.com/

[4] David Simon, “Introduction” in Rafael Alvarez, The Wire: Truth Be Told (New York: Pocket Books, 2004), 2

[5] Meghan O’Rourke, “Behind The Wire: David Simon on where the show goes next,” Slate, December 1, 2006,

[6] Aileen Gallagher, “Andre Royo on Playing Bubbles on "The Wire,’ Snitching, and His Emmy Speech,” Vulture: New York Entertainment, January 2008,

[7] David Mills, “Q&A: David Simon (pt 1),” Undercover Black Man, January 22, 2007,

[8] Simon, “Introduction”, 4

[9] ibid, 8

[10] ibid, 5

[11] ibid, 5-6

[12] Nick Hornby, “David Simon: Creator-Producer-Writer of HBO’s The Wire”, The Believer, August 2007,

[13] Eric Ducker, “The Left Behind: Inside The Wire’sWorld of Alienation and Asshole Gods,” Fader, December 2006,

[14] Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, The Communist Manifesto 1848 (Oxford: Oxford World’s Classics, 1998), 8.

[15] Jacob Weisberg, “The Wire on Fire: Analyzing the best show on television,” Slate, September 13, 2006,

[16] Scandalum Magnatum, “Balzac of Baltimore,” January 13, 2008,

[17] Simon, “Introduction”, 6

[18] ibid, 7

[19] ibid, 12

[20] Margaret Talbot, “Stealing Life: The crusader behind The Wire,” The New Yorker, October 22, 2007, http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/

[21] David Simon, “David Simon on Homicide, Truth and Journalism,” Bay Weekly, March 12-18, 1998,

[22] Dennis Lehane, “In Retrospect: Dennis Lehane on Clockers,” Critical Mass, February 23, 2008,

[23] David Simon on The Tubridy Show Ireland: RTE Radio 1, January 24, 2008,

[24] Simon, “Introduction”, 10-11

[25] Talbot

[26] Ed Burns, audio commentary on episode 4.1 (Boys of Summer) on The Wire: The Complete Fourth Season (HBO Video/Warner Home Video, 2008)

[27] Ducker

[28] Simon, audio commentary on episode 1.1

[29] Hornby

[30] Scandalum Magnatum

[31] O’Rourke

[32] David Simon and Edward Burns, The Corner: A Year in the Life of an Inner-City Neighborhood (New York: Broadway Books, 1998), 58

[33] Mills

[34] On the whiteboard that lists open homicide cases, an open case is marked in red and a closed case in black.

[35] Laurence Lanahan, “Secrets of the City: What The Wire reveals about urban journalism,” Columbia Journalism Review, January-February 2008,

[36] Scott Tobias “Interviews: David Simon” The AV Club, March 10, 2008,

[37] ibid

[38] ibid

[39] David Simon, “The Wire’s final season and the story everyone missed,” The Huffington Post, March 17, 2008,

[40] The writers of The Wire wanted to make a companion series to The Wire titled The Hall that would have focused more specifically on the political system. According to Simon, it would have acted as "an antidote to the Father-Knows-Best tonality of more popular political drama." Jim King, “Exclusive David Simon Q&A, The Wire on HBO”, 16 August, 2006,

[41] The "yes we can’ mobilised to elect Obama might seem to have revitalised faith in alternative pssibilities, but post-election demobilisation and lack of real change might come to experienced as co-optation and defeat again. Barack Obama, incidentally, when asked about his favourite TV programme, declared that it was The Wire and that Omar was his favourite character.

[42] Simon and Burns are currently working on Treme, a series set in post-Katrina New Orleans.

[43] The latest HBO drama involving Simon and Burns is Generation Kill, a drama based on the experiences of an embedded reporter in Iraq in 2003.

[44] O’Rourke

[45] Matthew Iglesias, “David Simon and the Audacity of Despair,” The Atlantic, January 2008,

[46] O’Rourke

[47] King

[48] Adam Kotsko, comment posted on March 23, 2008 on Joseph Kugelmass, “A Little Something You Can Touch: HBO’s The Wire and the Politics of Visual Media,” The Valve: A Literary Organ, March 20, 2008,

[49] Ken Tucker, Q&A with David Simon and Creative Team, special features on The Wire: The Complete Third Season (HBO Home Video/Warner Home Video, 2006).

[50] Mills

[51] David Simon, comment posted on Alan Sepinwall, January 27, 2007, “For The Wire Fans, What’s Alan Watching?”,

[52] Mills

[53] David Simon, comment posted on Matthew Iglesias

[54] David Simon, “Down To The Wire,” Baltimore Magazine, 2008,

[55] David Simon, “The Game is Real”, special features on The Wire: The Complete Fourth Season (HBO Home Video/Warner Home Video, 2008)

Bibliography of works cited

Burns, Ed. Audio commentary on episode 4.1 (Boys of Summer)on The Wire: The Complete Fourth Season[DVD] HBO Video/Warner Home Video, 2008

Ducker, Eric. “The Left Behind: Inside The Wire’sWorld of Alienation and Asshole Gods,” Fader, December 2006,

Gallagher, Aileen. “Andre Royo on Playing Bubbles on "The Wire,’ Snitching, and His Emmy Speech,” Vulture: New York Entertainment, January 2008,

Hornby, Nick. “David Simon: Creator-Producer-Writer of HBO’s The Wire,” The Believer, August 2007,

Iglesias, Matthew. “David Simon and the Audacity of Despair,” The Atlantic, January 2008 (including comment posted by David Simon, January 2, 2008),

King, Jim. “Exclusive David Simon Q&A, The Wire on HBO”, August 16, 2006,

Kugelmass, Joseph. “A Little Something You Can Touch: HBO’s The Wire and the Politics of Visual Media,” The Valve: A Literary Organ, March 20, 2008, (comment posted by Adam Kotskas, March 23, 2008),

Lanahan, Laurence. “Secrets of the City: What The Wire reveals about urban journalism,” Columbia Journalism Review, January-February 2008,

Lehane, Dennis. “In Retrospect: Dennis Lehane on Clockers,” Critical Mass, February 23, 2008,

Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. The Communist Manifesto. (1848) Oxford: Oxford World’s Classics 1998.

Mills, David. “Q&A: David Simon (pt. 1),” Undercover Black Man, January 22, 2007,

O’Rourke, Meghan. “Behind The Wire: David Simon on where the show goes next,” Slate, December 1, 2006,

Scandalum Magnatum, “Balzac of Baltimore,” Scandalum Magnatum, January 13, 2008,

Sepinwall, Alan. “For The Wire Fans, What’s Alan Watching?”, (comment posted by David Simon, January 27, 2007),

Simon, David. “David Simon on Homicide, Truth and Journalism,” Bay Weekly, March 12-18, 1998,

Simon, David. “Down To The Wire,” Baltimore Magazine,

Simon, David. Audio commentary on episode 1.1 (The Target) on The Wire: The Complete First Season.[DVD] HBO Video/Warner Home Video, 2005

Simon, David. “Introduction” in The Wire: Truth Be Told, Rafael Alvarez (ed), 2-34. New York: Pocket Books, 2004

Simon, David. Radio interview, The Tubridy Show, Ireland: RTE Radio 1, January 24, 2008,

Simon, David. Special features, “The Game is Real” on The Wire: The Complete Fourth Season[DVD] HBO Home Video/Warner Home Video, 2008

Simon, David. “The Wire’s final season and the story everyone missed,” The Huffington Post, March 17, 2008,

Simon, David and Burns, Edward. The Corner: A Year in the Life of an Inner-City Neighborhood. New York: Broadway Books, 1998

Talbot, Margaret. “Stealing Life: The crusader behind The Wire,” The New Yorker, October 22, 2007,

Tobias, Scott. “Interviews: David Simon”, The AV Club, March 10, 2008,

Tucker, Ken. Special features: “Q&A with David Simon and creative team” on The Wire: The Complete Third Season[DVD] HBO Home Video/Warner Home Video, 2006

Weisberg, Jacob. “The Wire on Fire: Analyzing the best show on television,” Slate, September 13, 2006.

To topJC 51 Jump Cut home

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License.